Home : World War II : Great Crusade :Amphibious Invasion
At best, an amphibious invasion is a great big exercise in logistics. The invader tries to dump soldiers and supplies ashore faster than the defender can push in reinforcements. One day in March 1943, Britain's top general, Field Marshal Alan Brooke, strode into the office of the general tapped to plan the details of D-Day. Brooke plopped the invasion directive onto the planner's desk and said, "Well, there it is; it won't work, but you must bloody well make it." Brooke's pessimism was anchored in facts. First among them was shipping, or rather the lack of it, especially in landing craft. The U.S. Navy wanted aircraft carriers to fight the Japanese, while Britain's Royal Navy wanted destroyers to deep-six German submarines. Neither navy sluiced many resources into landing craft like the LST - the landing ship-tank, basically a seagoing shoebox, ungainly and inglorious. As a result, many Allied plans ran aground on the lack of landing craft. Winston Churchill himself once sputtered, "The destinies of two great empires seem to be tied up in some goddamned things called LSTs." The D-Day planner, British Lt. Gen. Frederick Morgan, did what he could with the shipping they gave him. He laid out a three-division assault along 30 miles of coast, plus a division or so of paratroopers. It was the best he could do. But against 60 German divisions in France and the Low Countries, Morgan's best wasn't going to be good enough.
The plan appalled the British general who would lead the assault, Bernard L. Montgomery. He wanted at least five divisions along 50 miles, plus three more of paratroopers. He got them, mainly by persuading the Americans: to delay until August a simultaneous invasion of southern France, thus stealing that operation's shipping and to push back D-Day itself by a month, into June, thus picking up another month's production of landing craft. Now the question became: Where to land the landing craft? Hobby-shop shelves teem with military board games that let players reenact D-Day. The Allied player can land wherever he pleases along 2,000 miles of German-occupied coastline. But real life is no board game. Morgan found himself fenced in by harsh realities. The Allies had to stay within reach of their English-based fighter planes. Because most of those fighters were short-legged British Spitfires, the leash was short indeed. The Allies had to land near a good-sized port. (Ideally, they'd land at a port, but an ill-fated raid on Dieppe in August 1942 proved that a fortified port was too tough a nut to crack - and by 1944, all the ports were fortified.) Until the Allies could seize a port or two, they'd need sheltered, hard-packed beaches to supply themselves across, plus a decent road network inland. A short haul across the English Channel would mean quick turnarounds, which in effect would multiply shipping. A long haul - to the Brittany peninsula, say - would keep ships at sea longer, cutting the total tonnage. The Allies could have taken a chance on air power and outfoxed the Germans by landing far on the German flanks - say, in Norway. But once ashore in Norway, they'd face a long haul to Germany. The Americans wanted to take the shortest feasible route. The shortest feasible route lay across just 20 miles of the English Channel, to the Pas de Calais. But what was obvious to the Allies was equally obvious to the Germans, who stocked the Pas de Calais with every soldier and gun they could lay hands on.
Morgan's men played process of elimination. They whittled away potential sites until all that remained was the best - or at least the best compromise. Normandy was the best compromise. Normandy's beaches sat reasonably close to English ports and airfields, yet not too far off the main road to Germany. Normandy had a decent port (Cherbourg), plus beaches suitable for offloading until Cherbourg could be taken. Inland, the terrain beyond Caen looked flat enough for airfields. Best of all, Normandy wasn't the Pas de Calais, with its strong defenses. Which wasn't to say Normandy looked like a piece of cake. One four-mile stretch of beach looked especially ugly. It butted up against high bluffs - and from up there, the Germans could hose the beach with bullets and shells. But war comes down to hard choices, and the planners needed this stretch. They code-named it Omaha Beach. The German defenders had their own problems, most of which boiled down to one question: Do we fight them on the beach, or do we defend in depth? Defending in depth was classic German doctrine, and Field Marshal Gerd von Rundstedt was nothing if not a classic German general. (Defending in depth absorbs the momentum of the enemy's attack by forcing him to attack repeatedly through mutually supporting positions in depth.) Rundstedt commanded Germany's armies in the West and he wanted to keep them well back until the Allies committed themselves. Then, Rundstedt would roll his massed tanks at the attackers like a bowling ball. On the other side stood Rundstedt's main field general, Erwin Rommel. In January 1944, Rommel was made commander in chief of all German armies from the Netherlands to the Loire River. If all things were equal, Rommel said, we'd defend in depth. But his experience against the Allies in North Africa had taught him that all things wouldn't be equal. Field Marshal Gerd von Rundstedt expected the Allies to invade in the Pas-de-Calais because it was the shortest crossing from Britain and the nearest point to Germany. Hitler's HQ, although agreeing with this assessment, also considered a landing at Normandy as a possibility. Rommel, believing that Normandy was indeed a likely landing ground, argued that it did not matter to the Allies where they landed, just that the landing was successful. Rommel warned that the Allies would unleash air power of a lethality that generals like Rundstedt had never seen. Once the shooting started, he said, any tank that wasn't at the beaches would never get there. "We must stop him in the water, not only delaying him but destroying all his equipment while he is still afloat," Rommel said. Otherwise? "If we do not succeed in ... hurling them from the mainland in the first 48 hours, the invasion has succeeded - and the war is lost." On June 6, 1944, while Rommel was in Germany celebrating his wife's birthday, the Allies landed at Normandy. Soon after, Rommel was seriously wounded when Allied aircraft strafed his motorcar. As a result, he was forced to return to Germany to recover. While he was hospitalized, a failed attempt on Hitler's life was made. Rommel, a recent critic of Hitler's leadership, was implicated in the plot. Shortly thereafter, two German soldiers visited Rommel's sickbed. They offered him the unpleasant choice of committing suicide by ingesting poison pills or standing trial in what would most likely be a rigged and losing effort. Rommel chose the poison. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| Links & Recommended Sites | Oneliners, Stories, etc. |
| Questions? Anything Not Work? Not Look Right? My Policy Is To Blame The Computer. |
| About The Military And Wars | Link To Us | Site Navigation | Parting Shots |