|
The Small PrintDisclaimer: I've made an honest attempt at giving credit where it's due either by reference or hyperlink. All views expressed (unless noted) are my own. The web site is for entertainment and/or education purposes only. All trademark names and symbols are the property of their respective owners. The information gathered has been compiled for purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and/or research. A variety of sources is used and can't be guaranteed. I designed the site so feel free to duplicate or redistribute in any form what you find here. I haven't checked with or asked to many people about using the stuff on these pages.If you really got a problem with it, you can always take heart that we never intend to infringe on another's rights. Because it is not our intention to misuse the rights provided by copyright and fair use laws, we will most likely comply with all requests of the owner of the material. In a recent study, only 30% of copyright infringement claims present a clear fair use argument or substantiated claim of clear copyright. We maintain that if you contact us first, in all likelihood, the material will be removed. Where we can, we will use the provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Use of articles or photographs for reprint or reproduction on websites or print publications is always allowed, with specific provisions.
TITLE 17 of The U.S. Code - (COPYRIGHTS)CHAPTER 1-ยง 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include -
Link ExchangeLink exchange has been a long time practice by website owners since the beginning of the web. In the last few years (after year 2000), this practice has gained more popularity as search engines such as Google started favoring sites that had more links in the rankings. This system was very accurate at gauging the importance of a website when it first started, leading to the popularity of Google. You may be familiar with automatic link exchange services, however, there are some shady webmasters out there who do not reciprocate after they have agreed to exchange. Manual link exchange does take more time, but it's worth 10 fold more than an automatic link exchange service can offer. Dead links on your site or exchanging links with webmasters who are not reciprocating properly is of no value to you. True Reciprocal Link Exchange is of great value and these Link Partners are GOLDEN! If you are going to exchange links... Make it count! Do not, we repeat, DO NOT link to websites that offer no advantage to your website audience. This is no good for your website visitors and no good for the search engines. | |||||||||||